Search This Blog

Thursday, April 1, 2010

Announcing: Webinar Series on Literacy and Technology

We are delighted to announce a series of 4 webinars, taking place in April and May.  The focus of each session will be the link between literacy (thinking) strategies and the learning opportunities technology can provide to develop these strategies.

Following is a list of the topics, presenters, dates, and times of the webinars.  We sincerely hope you will join us.  

1.  Topic:  Technology Integration in a First Grade Classroom     
                   This webinar will provide an overview of a first grade classroom  
                   including the following topics:
   - What the students think of technology.
   - How to get started: podcasts, skyping, teacher tube 
     videos (curriculum based)
    - Learning the toolbar and "lingo" often used
    - Claymation - Science Unit on Plants 
    - I-movies - Social Studies, Science, and Literacy             
    - Podcasts with photo and music - Literacy
Presenter:  Alison Prescott, first grade teacher 
Date:  April 8, 2010
Time: 3:00-4:00 PM

2.  Topic: Using Wordle in a Dynamic Way
                   This webinar will cover how to use Wordle to edit and prioritize when 
                 creating definitions, etc. Small group and individual use of Wordle will be 
     Presenter:  Lynn Oullette middle school language arts  teacher, MLTI team leader   
Date:  April 13, 2010 
Time: 3:00-4:00 PM

3.  Topic: Perspectives on Blogging
               Two high school teachers, one Alt Ed English and one physics/engineering 
               teacher, share their experiences in using blogs with high school students. 
               The pros and cons, challenges and successes of blogging will be shared.  
               Student perspectives will be included. - Participants will be encouraged to 
               offer suggestions and ideas.

  Hattie Deraps,  alternative ed. English teacher

Jake Bogar, physics/engineering teacher

Date:  May 6, 2010 
Time: 3:15-4:15 PM

4.  Topic: Reading Differentiation in the Content Areas
               This webinar with demonstrate how content area teachers can organize 
               their instruction around curriculum based on the learning results, while 
               differentiating reading levels according to RTI guidelines.
Darlene Bassett, literacy specialist and educational consultant  
    Date: May 13, 2010
    Time: 3:00-4:00 PM

Bookmark and Share

Monday, March 29, 2010

A Fish Bowl Discussion in Physics? - Jake B.

On Thursday, March 25, I visited Jake's physics class.  As I entered the room, I noticed a sign posted on the door, " This is no longer a physics classroom, this is a general classroom."  I wondered what was going on - Jake often surprises me:) - pushed the door open and entered.  The room was completely rearranged!  The whole middle section had been replaced by a circular table.  Two signs hung overhead - "fish bowl" and "hot seat".

 Students and Jake explained they were working on a discussion format and the topic of the day was, "Are industrial wind turbine projects good for Maine?"

The framework for the discussion is as follows.
  1. The first 10 minutes are spent as an introduction to outline the process. Students are reminded the purpose of a discussion is to come up with a better understanding of subject and then make a go or no go decision.

  2. The next 15 minutes are spent doing 5 chalk talks.

Informational readings are posted around the room.


Important passages are highlighted for students to review.

Students are to  read and comment - as well as meta-comment - on the brain boards provided.  No talking - looking and writing.

These comments and reflections are to be used later to provide a basis for discussion.

   3.  The final 30 minutes are spent participating - through talk or listening - in a  discussion of the topic.  

 The fish bowl format consists of 8 students at the table:
  • 6 for discussion
  • 1 as facilitator to keep the flow going and bring back the discussion to the topic through prompts
  • 1 as a book keeper, tracking the conversation by using a list of names and tallying do's (+) and don'ts (-)   
  • the" hot seat" is at the head of the table and is available for those who have important information to add at the moment (meta-commenting) 
  • the fact checker checks the accuracy of statements at request using the computer and sitting outside of the circle.
  • The rest of the class sits outside of the circle and monitors the discussion (people are listening and formulating ideas) - joining in through the "hot seat" or tapping someone who has been in there for a while and swapping places.
Jake reminded the students to keep up the flow of the conversation in order to move their thinking along.

The process moved along smoothly with high student engagement.  Jake stepped in only when some clarification was needed.  The level of conversation was high.  The thinking reflected by the statements were impressive.  Students had clear rationales for their statements.  

What impressed me the most, was the level of meta-cognition and collaboration.  They followed other's thoughts and agreed, disagreed, clarified, and built on statements fluidly.  The language was purposeful and the information accurate and appropriate.  This is exactly what students need for the 21st century.  Kudos to all for a great job!
Bookmark and Share